District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 21 - 30 of 163,362
Resurgens Investments, LLC v. Sullivan Financial Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Resurgens Investments, LLC
Defendant:
Sullivan Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FYR SFR Borrower, LLC v. Hall et al
as 1:2024cv02105
Plaintiff:
FYR SFR Borrower, LLC
Defendant:
V. Kesha Hall, Eugene Campbell and Jordan Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Boyd v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
Juanda Boyd
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lawrence v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Anthony Demetris Lawrence
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Pittman v. Atlanta Missions
as 1:2024cv02108
Plaintiff:
Nadira Pittman
Defendant:
Atlanta Missions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
McMillian v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02121
Petitioner:
Christopher McMillian
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pittman v. United States Government
as 1:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Nadera Pittman
Defendant:
United States Government
Doe v. Emory University
as 1:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Emory University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Streiff v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2024cv02118
Plaintiff:
Jordan Daniel Streiff
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Matthew Gordon and Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
