US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 26,339
DOUGLAS v. AMMONS
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
MELISSA A DOUGLAS
Defendant:
Judge G WAYNE AMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
AMANDA, WALKER, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER
Defendant:
MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crumpler v. Westlake Services Holding Company et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Daniel Crumpler
Defendant:
Westlake Services Holding Company and Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CRUMPLER v. WESTLAKE SERVICES HOLDING COMPANY
as 7:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CRUMPLER
Defendant:
WESTLAKE SERVICES HOLDING COMPANY and PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SCOTT v. BOBBITT
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
DEMETRICE SCOTT
Respondent:
Warden TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. EAKIN et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ZACHARY EAKIN, BURGUNDY TIMBER INC, WPGM LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 4:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Respondent:
TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Oliver v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Oliver
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
