District Court Cases in West Virginia
Cases 41 - 50 of 140,630
Barnett v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Betty Barnett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robinson v. Beane et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Martin Riley Robinson
Defendant:
Honorable Judge John D. Beane, Russ Skogstad, Talia Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Tom's Plumbing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Tom's Plumbing, Inc. doing business as Mullen Plumbing, Heating and Cooling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ruth Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
General Insurance Company of America v. Bossio
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
General Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Bernard Bossio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Su v. Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marsh v. Garrett et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Marsh
Defendant:
J. R. Garrett, A. Jordan, L. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Arresting Officers et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Holly R. Harper
Defendant:
The Huntington Police Department, The Magistrate Court of Cabell Co., WV State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
