District Court Cases in Washington
Cases 21 - 30 of 80,771
Harding v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Torie M Harding
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rembold v. Holland America Line Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Charles Rembold
Defendant:
Holland America Line Inc., Holland America Line NV and HAL Antillen N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Loop v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
John Torsten Loop
Defendant:
State of Washington, JAMS Mediation Arbitration and ADR Services and Helen L Halpert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Langworthy v. Washington Department of Social and Health Services
as 3:2024cv05373
Plaintiff:
Geneva Langworthy
Defendant:
Washington Department of Social and Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wallace v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05368
Plaintiff:
Annette M Wallace
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Herrera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05374
Plaintiff:
Cassidy B Herrera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Riviera et al v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
James Riviera, Curtis Banta, Yonkman Construction, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kjell Anderson, Jay Arnold, Todd Beyreuther and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Bichler v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Patrice Bichler
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pugh v. Devos et al
as 3:2024cv05376
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Pugh
Defendant:
Keith Devos, Tabitha Yockey, Shawn Candella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
