Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,332
Ravenscroft v. Office of the Fredrick County Comissions et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Ravenscroft, Jr
Defendant:
Office of the Fredrick County Comissions, Office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth, Office of the Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. GRTC of Richmond Virginia
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
GRTC of Richmond Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Randy Anderson
Defendant:
Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. United States
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Outlaw v. Meade et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Outlaw
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown-El v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00318
Petitioner:
Tina Brown-El
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsey v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Charles C. Ramsey
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walters v. Medical Staff et al
as 2:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Russell Walters
Defendant:
Medical Staff and Security Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aljazairi v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Nofel Aljazairi
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
