South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,887
Dhimo v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv03039
Petitioner:
Alqi Dhimo
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Lieber Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Eugene King
Defendant:
Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Orr v. Richland County
as 4:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clay Orr
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Grant v. Deputy Angel Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Herman Grant, Jr.
Defendant:
Deputy Angel Rodriguez, Deputy Richard Sholtz and John Doe Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Young v. USA
as 3:2024cv03013
Petitioner:
Kenneth Levi Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Saenz-Quintero v. FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
as 0:2024cv03009
Petitioner:
Jose Saenz-Quintero
Respondent:
FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Greer Police Department
as 6:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Greer Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robinson v. Scott
as 6:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson and Joshua HayMaker
Defendant:
Brittany D Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Locklear v. J. Reuben Long Detention Center
as 6:2024cv02969
Plaintiff:
Justin Locklear
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Seabrooks v. Richland County et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Seabrooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Richland County, Crayman Harvey, Kevin McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
