District Court Cases in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 425,927
Lykens v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Scott Lykens
Defendant:
Colete S. Peters, James Petrucci, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Brown v. USA
as 3:2024cv00727
Petitioner:
Anthony Quamaine Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bozier v. Warden of SCI-Dallas et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Petitioner:
Michael Bozier
Respondent:
Warden of SCI-Dallas and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Posey v. Brittain et al
as 3:2024cv00730
Petitioner:
Ajani Posey
Respondent:
Kathy Brittain and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tejada v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ricky Tejada
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCAS v. BRITTAIN et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
KEYON LUCAS
Respondent:
KATHY J. BRITTAIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETROGIANNIS
as 2:2024cv01795
Plaintiff:
MARIA PETROGIANNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
MAXA v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
AARON MAXA
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
