Ohio Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,357
Wagenschein v. CEDAR RIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 2:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Ethan Wagenschein
Defendant:
CEDAR RIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Stearman v. SCT Operations Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00865
Plaintiff:
Jason Stearman
Defendant:
SCT Operations Inc. and Brendan Anderson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Breslin v. The RDI Corporation
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kambra Breslin
Defendant:
The RDI Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pollard v. Revere Plastics Systems, LLC
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Pollard
Defendant:
Revere Plastics Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Burrell v. Pison Stream Solutions, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Michelle Burrell
Defendant:
Pison Stream Solutions, Inc. and Joseph H. James
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lykins v. MPS Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Chris Lykins
Defendant:
MPS Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Balaban v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al.
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Balaban
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Peterson v. Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Helen Peterson
Defendant:
Workhorse Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Blue v. Inoac Exterior Systems, LLC
as 3:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Tyson Blue
Defendant:
Inoac Exterior Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Woodrow v. Tango Fiber, INC
as 3:2024cv00839
Plaintiff:
Aaron Woodrow
Defendant:
TANGO FIBER, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
