North Carolina Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,572
Manglik v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Amit Manglik
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WOODBURY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODBURY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Charissa Dawn Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniels
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cornitha Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
v. Livesay et al
as 4:2024cv00068
Defendant:
April D. Livesay and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Livesay v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
April Livesay
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Shively v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Shively
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HOSKINSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOSKINSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McNeill v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith McNeill
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Blake v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Dominic Blake
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
