US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 37,675
Manglik v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Amit Manglik
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Yarborough v. HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 5:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Ernest Yarborough
Defendant:
HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. and VISA, Inc.
Williams v. Barrier Island Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Williams
Defendant:
Barrier Island Inc. and Lonnie Perry Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Williams v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03124
Plaintiff:
Jasper Williams
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawkins v. Thompson et al
as 5:2024ct03123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Lamar Dawkins
Defendant:
Captain Tanesha Thompson, Captain Powell Wendell, Sergeant Dunia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorhead v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Mark W Moorhead
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02096
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Macon v. Morton et al
as 5:2024ct03116
Plaintiff:
Cory Montae Macon
Defendant:
Warden Morton, Michael Russell, State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
