Montana Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,343
Loeffler v. Ravalli County et al
as 9:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Dan Robert Loeffler
Defendant:
Ravalli County, Jarin Gassett, Keenan Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richard v. Aliperto et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Susan L. Richard
Defendant:
Jordan Aliperto, Patrick Levitt and The City of Great Falls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Melvin v. Livingston et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Ronald P. Melvin
Defendant:
Brooke Livingston, Austin Rubel, Andy Ivanoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
McCracken v. Atkins et al
as 9:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stewart A. McCracken
Defendant:
Ethan Atkins, Eric Lindauer and Mineral County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thomas v. Sanders County Sheriff's Department et al
as 9:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Karl Thomas
Defendant:
Sanders County Sheriff's Department, Laurie Hines and William T. Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Weber v. Beal et al
as 4:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Weber
Defendant:
Alex Beal and Landee Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weber v. O'Connor
as 4:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Weber
Defendant:
Maureen O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
