District Court Cases in Massachusetts
Cases 31 - 40 of 67,522
Potvin v. Blue Water Fisheries, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11278
Plaintiff:
John Potvin
Defendant:
Blue Water Fisheries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
IN RE: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
as 1:2024cv11274
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Donnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pedroza v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11282
Plaintiff:
Andrew Pedroza
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodrigues Da Silva v. Silveira Da Silva et al
as 1:2024cv11280
Plaintiff:
Edervaldo Rodrigues Da Silva
Defendant:
Jessica Silveira Da Silva and Gilberto Lucas
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Pavestone, LLC
as 1:2024cv11276
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant:
Pavestone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
Tractel, Ltd. v. Benson Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv11286
Plaintiff:
Tractel, Ltd.
Defendant:
Benson Industries, Inc. and Roopnarayan Ramlakhan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Freeman v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11289
Plaintiff:
Jibrail Q Freeman
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Galdos-Shapiro v. The Town of Great Barrington et al
as 3:2024cv30070
Plaintiff:
Arantzazu Zuzene Galdos-Shapiro
Defendant:
The Town of Great Barrington, The Berkshire Hills Regional School District, Paul E. Storti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beatty v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv11284
Petitioner:
Joseph W Beatty
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
