Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12,875
Bixler v. USA
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Bixler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
James Steven Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dike v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Vickie Diane Dike
Defendant:
David Knight, Trey English, Heather McGinness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Thornton
Defendant:
Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Bradley
as 5:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Kareem M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden David Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Miller et al
as 3:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Dcorya White
Defendant:
Lisa Miller, Amanda Web, Jessica Cogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Campbell County 17th District Court
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gerald Nugget Williams
Defendant:
Campbell County 17th District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez-Gomez v. USA
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Mario Velasquez-Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Moore v. McCalister et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Darnell Moore
Defendant:
Robin McCalister, Delvin Nielsen, Dylan Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. City of Louisville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
City of Louisville Police Dept. and Victims Rights and Advocacy Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
