Kansas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,721
Spencer (ID 126729) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Michaela Lea Spencer
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles (ID 122198) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Kora L. Liles
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger (ID 126377) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Kimberley S. Younger
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett (ID 122203) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lockett
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz (ID 124145) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Barbara Marie Frantz
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (ID 98286) v. Langford
as 5:2024cv03065
Petitioner:
Austin Jones
Respondent:
Donald Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McShan v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03066
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jawon McShan
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Hostess Brands LLC
as 5:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Hostess Brands LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. (lnu) (1) et al
as 5:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2), Johnson County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskin v. Fort Scott Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Nico Baskin
Defendant:
Fort Scott Police Department and Bourbon County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
