US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,315
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Finley v. Brewer et al
as 2:2024cv02110
Plaintiff:
Joseph Finley
Defendant:
Seth Brewer and Brandon Spindler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailey v. Arens et al
as 3:2024cv03120
Plaintiff:
Corey Dailey
Defendant:
. Arens, . Zanger, J Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
John Moore
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. Group 2029, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Taylor Bray
Defendant:
Group 2029, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Blanke v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2024cv04089
Plaintiff:
Jack Blanke
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Crystal Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
