Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,446
Baker v. Town of Hamden et al
as 3:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Patrick Baker
Defendant:
Town of Hamden, Veterinary Associates of Derby LLC, Central Hospital for Veterinary Medicine, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cornish v. Town of New Britain et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of New Britain, Calvin Wentworth, Matthew Marino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cepeda v. Winfertility, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00857
Plaintiff:
Jose Cepeda
Defendant:
Winfertility, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Stancuna v. Town of Westport et al
as 3:2024cv00848
Plaintiff:
Marin Stancuna
Defendant:
Town of Westport and William Harmer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
VonDrake Harris v. Berchem et al
as 3:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Gerard VonDrake Harris
Defendant:
Jonathan David Berchem and Paige Bodnar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
