District Court Cases in California
Cases 31 - 40 of 641,315
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02948
Plaintiff:
Melissa Miller
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Butler et al v. BIC USA Inc.
as 4:2024cv02955
Plaintiff:
Casina Butler and Benson Pai
Defendant:
BIC USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lettieri v. Four in One
as 4:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Four in One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District v. Imperial Valley Healthcare District et al
as 3:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Pioneers Memorial Healthcare District
Defendant:
Robert Amparano
Respondent:
Imperial Valley Healthcare District, Enola Berker, Katherine Burnworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Ramos et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2024cv04066
Plaintiff:
Mario Ramos and Steve Ramos
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Prelude Systems, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01061
Petitioner:
Prelude Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
