US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 22,017
Bryant v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Bryant
Defendant:
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kirkpatrick v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Loris E Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Williams v. Office of General Counsel et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Office of General Counsel, Alabama DHR, Barbour DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Reece et al
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Lt. Deputy Tracey Reece and Sheriff Tyrone Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Google LLC
as 2:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Google LLC doing business as Youtube
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Chilton County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Woods
Defendant:
Chilton County Jail, Ann Davis and Kathy Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
