U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 152,178
Love v. Kaiser Permanente Consolidated, et al.
as 24-3065
Plaintiff:
TAMARA LOVE
Defendant:
KAISER PERMANENTE CONSOLIDATED and KAISER PERMANENTE EMPLOYER HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON
Bowman, et al. v. Novad Management Consulting, LLC, et al.
as 24-3063
Plaintiff:
KEYUBBA BOWMAN and RASHON BOWMAN
Defendant:
NOVAD MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, LLC, an Oklahoma Limited Liability Corporation, ISN CORPORATION, a Maryland Corporation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Kitsap Rifle and Revolver Club v. Northland Insurance Company
as 24-3064
Plaintiff:
KITSAP RIFLE AND REVOLVER CLUB
Defendant:
NORTHLAND INSURANCE COMPANY
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Valencia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3052
Petitioner:
CARLOS VALENCIA, KATHERINE RIOS, MAROLYN PORTOCARRERO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Lillard
as 24-3055
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LONNIE EUGENE LILLARD
United States of America v. Densley
as 24-3056
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GEORGE DENSLEY
United States of America v. Morse
as 24-3057
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DERYL CRAIG MORSE
Andrich v. Glynn, et al.
as 24-3078
Plaintiff:
DEVIN ANDRICH
Defendant:
COURTNEY R. GLYNN, in her individual, official and supervisory capacities, BRAD K. KEOUGH, in his individual, supervisory and official capacities, DAVID SHINN, in his official capacity and others
Lettieri v. T-Mobile US, Inc., et al.
as 24-3088
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARMINE LETTIERI
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC., SUSAN JOHNSON, PAUL E. BUNANNO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
