U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 53,209
Singh v. Garland
as 24-1292
Petitioner:
PARAMJIT SINGH, BALVIR KAUR, MANPREET KAUR and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Romero-Regalado v. Garland
as 24-1293
Petitioner:
MARIA VANESA ROMERO-REGALADO and ADRIAN SAMUEL ROMERO-REGALADO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
New York State Firearms Association v. Chiumento
as 24-1290
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK STATE FIREARMS ASSOCIATION, GEORGE BORRELLO, DAVID DIPIETRO and others
Defendant:
DOMINICK L. CHIUMENTO, in his official capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police
Robertson v. Trinity Packaging Corporation
as 24-1296
Plaintiff:
CLAUDE ROBERTSON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and JOHN SZALASNY, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
TRINITY PACKAGING CORPORATION
Singh v. Garland
as 24-1291
Petitioner:
LOVEJEET SINGH
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lobato Quito v. Garland
as 24-1297
Petitioner:
MILTON WLADIMIR LOBATO QUITO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tola-Beltran v. Garland
as 24-1295
Petitioner:
MIRLA PATRICIA TOLA-BELTRAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Greene v. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
as 24-1289
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC GREENE
Defendant:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States of America v. Case
as 24-1294
Defendant:
MARY A. OSGOOD, ROBERT V. CASE, JUBILEE ENTERPRISES and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice
as 24-1299
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
