D.C. Circuit Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 76,907
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
KANDI BAR LLC v. SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD et al
as 1:2024cv01393
Plaintiff:
KANDI BAR LLC
Defendant:
SHENZHEN XIANGSHA NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD and CHEN XIAOLI
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
KANDI BAR LLC v. WUHAN YIKENAN TRADING CO., LTD et al
as 1:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
KANDI BAR LLC
Defendant:
WUHAN YIKENAN TRADING CO., LTD and LUO DAN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BLOCKER-COVINGTON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
EDNA BLOCKER-COVINGTON
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
as 1:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml01063
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jonathan Mullane v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5129
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mullane
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission
Marcellin Basengezi v. Andrea Gacki, et al
as 24-5130
Plaintiff:
Marcellin Mukolo Basengezi
Defendant:
Andrea M. Gacki, in her official capacity as Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control and United States Department of the Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
