District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 163,362
Gray v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
David B. Gray
Defendant:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ussery v. State of GA et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Roger Ussery
Respondent:
State of GA, Georgia State Prison and R. U. Jackson
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Borders et al
as 1:2024cv02120
Plaintiff:
Jamie T. Jackson
Defendant:
Timothy Borders, Clear Creek Freight LLC doing business as RHT, Cherokee Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company v. Tuck
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Tuck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Pinnacle Management v. Cole
as 1:2024cv02125
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Management
Defendant:
Alexis Cole
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Owners Insurance Company v. Mobile Drug Screening LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mobile Drug Screening LLC and Timothy Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
DOUGLAS v. AMMONS
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
MELISSA A DOUGLAS
Defendant:
Judge G WAYNE AMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. AMANDA et al
as 5:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN EDWARD BROWN
Defendant:
AMANDA, WALKER, DENISE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
