District Court Cases in Alabama
Cases 1 - 10 of 90,232
Frankenmuth Insurance Company v. Cecil Wayne Sanford et al
as 2:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
Frankenmuth Insurance Company
Defendant:
Cecil Wayne Sanford and Stone Pointe Builders LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Huddleston v. Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.
as 1:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Tommy Huddleston
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fortado et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Linda Fortado and Michael Fortado
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lamar v. Joe Bullard Cadillac, LLC
as 1:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Sheticia R Lamar
Defendant:
Joe Bullard Cadillac, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bryant v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Bryant
Defendant:
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brightspeed of Southern Alabama, LLC v. City of Foley et al
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Brightspeed of Southern Alabama, LLC
Defendant:
City of Foley and Utilities Board of the City of Foley, Alabama d/b/a Riviera Utilities
Farrell v. Harrell et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Farrell
Defendant:
Mark Harrell, Larry Nixon and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kirkpatrick v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Loris E Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
